In the following thread
http://social.answers.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/vistarepair/thread/e9d0eba4-b9f9-4bfe-915b-3d5794c29efb/ I provided essentially the same answer as the person credited with providing the answer (and in fact provided an additional option not given by the person credited which may have been more useful). I don't mind if he
also receives credit, but I believe my answer was first (he just took a part of it and said the same thing I did in different words) and was correct and should be marked as such.
I've never complained about this before, but this was such a flagrant example that I felt compelled to report it and see if someone would take another look at the thread and perhaps give credit where credit is due.
Thanks!